CRACKS, GAPS and CURTAINS (2003)

      I have tried to interpret my work numerous times, and found different methods of such interpretation. I have referred to “Rhythm and relativism” as a definition of the semantic – visual structure of art in many of my earlier texts. In others (e.g. “pictures and… pictures”), I clashed various misunderstandings which result from the wrong interpretation of the notion ofa picture, and realized that the essence of my work is also the superimposition of many pictures on one another and relativization of their temporary meaning.

Art and Tricks (2002)

The latest (May) issue of DIGIT featured Kuba Tatarkiewicz’s text ‘The Art of Art’, where the author attempts to present his definition of art. A very ambitious topic, especially in a computer magazine, although DIGIT’s subtitle in its vignette reads – ART, TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN. Kuba Tatarkiewicz’s text presented all the paradoxical misunderstandings about the subject – art and computer.

Exhibition at Galeria Milano (1994)

I’ve been experiencing a strange feeling lately that opening new exhibitions is something absurd and ridiculous. Like flexing one’s muscles at a bodybuilding show or vocal displays ‘at my aunt’s on my name day’ It’s scribbling on canvas or whatever and creating ooooooobjects of art that carry no concrete meaning or practical consequences ….

Relativity and Rhythm in Art (1993)

Art begins where reality ends. However, this does not make it unreal or irrelevant to us. Compared to the real world, the reality of art is on a parallel dimension. Although art refers to the same objects and problems that are familiar in everyday life, it places them in a different space, in a different environment. It changes their meaning and their place in our “world view of reality”.

.